2006 (11) TMI 355

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....kul Rohtagi, Sr. Advocates, and C.M. Jayakumar, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocates with them, for the Appellant. S/Shri Satish Pandey, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Medhavi Kumar, Ajay Majithia, Rajesh Kumar, K.L. Janjani, Advocates and R. Mohan, A.S.G., Mohan Parasaran, A.S.G., P. Parmeswaran, B. Krishna Prasad, T.V. Ratnam, Advocates with them, for the Respondent. [Judgment per : A.R. Lakshmanan, J.]....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1. On 9th February, 2005, this Court simply adjourned the matter as the counsel for the revenue sought time to file an affidavit in reply of the Commissioner (Investigation). However, the Central Government Advocate in his letter dated 11th February, 2005, apart from making several incorrect statements quoted hereinabove, he has falsely stated that the court has granted interim relief in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....present before us today has tendered unconditional apology and has filed an affidavit to that effect in writing on 27th March, 2006. In these circumstances, we leave it to the Revenue Secretary of the Central Government and to the C.B.E.C., New Delhi to take appropriate action as they deem fit against Dr. T.C. Kaushik and Mr. M.G. Rao." 4. The appellant - Dr. T.C. Kaushik filed an affidavi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lly not correct. I unconditionally tender my apology for the same. I pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to accept the same. Solemnly affirmed at Mumbai this 27th day of March 2006: Deponent'' 5. We have perused the affidavit tendering unconditional apology. In our opinion, the affidavit of apology appears to be honest and genuine. The High Court ought to have accepted the apology t....