Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (9) TMI 330

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....resentative, for the Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  This group of appeals, which raises common issue, has been preferred against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) to the extent that it goes against the Revenue. 2. By the order-in-original duty demands were confirmed and penalties imposed on the ground that when the goods were returned manufacturing pro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eals) noted that the assessee had received duty paid excisable goods back from the customer for reprocessing under rule 173H by their letter dated 29-1-2000. They had sought permission to receive the duty paid goods under rule 173H(2)(c) from the Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that the nature of the reprocessing indicated that manufacture was involved. 5.&....