Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (8) TMI 367

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ms. Ashima Bansal, S.D.R., for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides and perused the record. 2. There is a short levy demand of above Rs. 47 lakhs. Out of this, an amount of about Rs. 25.5 lakhs is arising from a dispute in regard to the valuation of captively consumed yarn. The yarn in question was used in the manufacture of hosiery items in the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pproved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Sidhartha Tubes [2000 (115) E.L.T. 32 (S.C.)]. As against this, the submission of the learned Counsel for the applicant is that valuation and payment of duty were made in terms of the law at the time of removal of the yarn and thus, no short levy had taken place. It is also his submission that only a small portion of the yarn removed for cap....