2005 (4) TMI 524

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri Randhir Singh, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)].-  In this appeal, the appellants had disputed the correctness of the impugned order vide which the duty in respect of the waste of the glass wool had been confirmed against them. 2. Ld. Counsel has contended that the waste of glass wool does not find mention in the Tariff under any heading or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ugned order. 4. We have heard both the sides and gone through the record. We find that in the appellant's own case, which is reported in 2000 (121) E.L.T. 633, this plea of the appellants that the waste of the glass wool is not excisable, was not accepted by the Tribunal and the same was held to be excisable. The argument of the ld. Counsel that the said judgment of the Tribunal, is not bi....