Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (4) TMI 336

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uiser Prado' vehicle from an importer, Shri Iqbal Shaik Bapu for certain consideration. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) conducted certain investigations which revealed that at the time of import of the vehicle, there was mis-declaration of the model, age, usage and value of the vehicle with a view to overcome import restrictions and to evade applicable duty. The vehicle was declared to be of 1990 make with a value of Rs. 1,00,000/-. The importer cleared the vehicle in terms of ITC Public Notice No. 3/97-02 under Category 'A' on payment of Rs. 3,20,084/- as duty on the appraised value of Rs. 3,23,391/-. Later the importer registered the vehicle with RTO, Bangalore. At the time of registration, he declared the year of manufactur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y challenged the impugned order. Hence he has come before the Tribunal for relief. 3. Shri Laxmi Narayan, the learned Advocate appeared for the appellant and Shri Ganesh Havanur, the learned SDR appeared on behalf of the Revenue. 4. The learned Advocate made the following submissions :- (i)      The appellant is a bona fide purchaser who purchased the impugned car on payment of consideration. The vehicle was cleared by the Customs after assessment under Section 47 of the Customs Act. Once the goods are cleared after assessment under Section 47 of the Customs Act, without review of the order of the assessment under Section 130 of the Customs Act, the show cause notice issued under Sections 28 and 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....;   Sima Khatib v. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai [2004 (166) E.L.T. 119 (Tri. - Mumbai)] (iii)   Sumant Sood v. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai [2001 (134) E.L.T. 817 (Tri. - Del.)] (iv)   Titanide Coating (P) Ltd. v. Assistant Collector of Customs [1993 (67) E.L.T. 260 (Kar.)] 6. We have gone through the records of the case carefully. The DRI investigations revealed that the impugned car was cleared from the Customs by misdeclaration of the model and value. The misdeclaration was resorted to circumvent the licensing condition. In order to import the car without licence restriction, the main condition is that it should have been in possession of the importer for at least one year. It is seen th....