Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (6) TMI 255

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tails. Assessee furnished purchase bills for computers. The major purchases were from M/s. Maharashtra Infotech India Ltd. to the tune of Rs. 4,53,200. Information under section 133(6) was called for from the said party to verify the genuineness of purchases. That party did not confirm the transactions by filing copy of accounts. Assessee was asked to produce the party. It was informed that the party had wound up and directors have left for USA. Inspector was deputed to ascertain and it was ascertained that director Shri Joshi was now running the business in the name and style of M/s. Easy Life India Ltd. against M/s. Maharashtra Infotech India Ltd., which has been closed down. Summons were issued to Mr. Joshi. He did not confirm the sale o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....agreed that the claim of depreciation on such computers would be offered for tax under section 41(1) of the Act, during the year relevant to the assessment year 2005-06. Accepting the above, CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 4,53,200, to allow depreciation on the cost of Rs. 1,00,000 that is to say Rs. 60,000 against the claim of Rs. 2,71,920 and also directed to ensure that the excess depreciation claimed in the subsequent years is offered for taxation as income for assessment year 2005-06. Aggrieved by the above order, revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. Contending parties reiterated their respective stand. 7. Considering the rival submissions, I find no reason to disturb the order of the f....