2006 (4) TMI 302

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. Shri A. Khandekar, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : K.K. Agarwal, Member (T)]. - The respondents are registered as a 100% E.O.U. and engaged in the manufacture and clearance of phthalic anhydride falling under Chapter 29 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. After getting permission from the Development Commissioner for clearance of the excisable goods into Domestic Tariff Are....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ces of identical goods prevailing at the relevant time and the actual value realised in the local market is not relevant for the purpose of determination of value under Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962, when the prices at the relevant time and place of importation are available in respect of identical goods. This order of the Assistant Commissioner was upheld by Commissioner (Appeals). 2. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the Assistant Commissioner (Customs) based on the value at the time of importation of identical goods. 3. We have considered the submissions, we find that in case of 100% E.O.U. under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 the excisable goods produced or manufactured in 100% E.O.U. are liable to such excise duty in an amount equal to 50% of the aggregate of duties of custom which wo....