2006 (3) TMI 426
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for the Appellant. Shri Vimlesh Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. This application is filed in an appeal against order in Appeal No. SVS/66/NGP/1/2005, dated 24-2-2005 by the said orders. Revenue had demanded duty of Rs. 43,41,250/- under Section 11A(1) and penalty of Rs. 37,11,894/- under Section 11AC and Rs. 6,29,356/- under Rule....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2001 (138) E.L.T. 585 (Tri.-Delhi) & Link Locks Pvt. Ltd., 2002 (140) E.L.T. 84 (Tribunal) = 2002 (48) R.L.T. 12 (CEGAT-Delhi) & LMS Foundry Pvt. Ltd., 2001 (132) E.L.T. 709 (Tri.-Delhi) and when read along with CBEC Circular No. 509/5/2000/CX, dated 18-1-2000 herein it is clarified that SSI benefit cannot be denied when inputs are supplied with the brand names and the fact that the department was....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI