2006 (3) TMI 426
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for the Appellant. Shri Vimlesh Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. This application is filed in an appeal against order in Appeal No. SVS/66/NGP/1/2005, dated 24-2-2005 by the said orders. Revenue had demanded duty of Rs. 43,41,250/- under Section 11A(1) and penalty of Rs. 37,11,894/- under Section 11AC and Rs. 6,29,356/- under Rule....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2001 (138) E.L.T. 585 (Tri.-Delhi) & Link Locks Pvt. Ltd., 2002 (140) E.L.T. 84 (Tribunal) = 2002 (48) R.L.T. 12 (CEGAT-Delhi) & LMS Foundry Pvt. Ltd., 2001 (132) E.L.T. 709 (Tri.-Delhi) and when read along with CBEC Circular No. 509/5/2000/CX, dated 18-1-2000 herein it is clarified that SSI benefit cannot be denied when inputs are supplied with the brand names and the fact that the department was....
TaxTMI