2005 (9) TMI 489
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd, CA, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - In this application of the Revenue, it is submitted that there is an apparent mistake in our Final Order No. 205/2005, dated 10-2-2005 [2005 (184) E.L.T. 282 (T)] passed in the captioned appeal. After examining the records and hearing both sides, we find that, in the final order, we were following, with approval, the view t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e records" and the same requires to be rectified. 3. In this application, the Department has not found fault with our observation contained in the last sentence of Para 2 of the final order. We observed that the ld. Consultant's submission that Order-in-Appeal No. 148/2003 had not been appealed against was not disputed. Our conclusion in the final order is based on this fact. That Order-in....
TaxTMI