2005 (12) TMI 359
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....DR, for the Appellant. Shri Mayur Shroff, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - Heard the ld. SDR in the miscellaneous application filed by the Revenue and ld. Advocate Shri Mayur Shroff for the respondent. Vide order No. S/344-345/WZB/2005-C-II dated 10-5-2005 the Bench after noting that goods worth Rs. 12 lakhs (Rupees twelve lakhs only) had been c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... by Central Excise officers, it was found that the party had replaced imported confiscated goods with goods of local marking and copy of the Panchanama drawn on that date was enclosed. This plea and the Panchanama do not indicate that alleged substitution of the goods had taken place on or before the order dated 10-5-2005 of this Tribunal. The plea of the Tribunal being misled on 10-5-2005 by the ....
TaxTMI