2003 (5) TMI 471

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Per M.K. Chaturvedi, Vice President. - These cross appeals are directed against the order of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XXI, Bombay and relate to the assessment year 1992-93. Assessing Officer disallowed the employees' and employer's contribution to PF, FPF, etc. amounting to Rs. 1,71,969. CIT(A) allowed the employer's contribution of Rs. 91,477, for which the Departmental is in appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nuation fund or gratuity fund or any other fund for the welfare of the employees shall be allowed (irrespective of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred by the assessee according to the method of accounting regularly employed by him) only in computing the income referred to in section 28 of that previous year in which such sum is actually paid by him. 4. Second p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s held that payments were to be allowed as deduction even though the payments were made a few days later than the due date as reckoned for the month for which the salary was paid. In deciding this issue, the Tribunal followed the decisions rendered in the case of Hunsur Plywood Works Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [1995] 54 ITD 394 (Bang.), Madras Radiators & Pressings Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [1996] 59 ITD 515 (Mad.) an....