Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (1) TMI 276

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvocate, for the Appellant. Shri U.H. Jadhav, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - All the four appeals, are being disposed off by a common order as they are directed against the same impugned order passed by Commissioner vide which he has confirmed demand of duty of Rs. 27,71,594/- against M/s. Anurang Engg. Co. Ltd. along with imposition of personal penal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....valuation of Aluminium castings manufactured by M/s. Anurang Engg. Co. Ltd., which in turn is based upon the cost of Aluminium ingots supplied by M/s. Bajaj Auto Ltd. The adjudicating authority has observed that the landed cost of Aluminium ingots has not been shown correctly. As such by addition of charges @ of 1%, loading unloading charges @ of 5% and the profit margin of M/s. Bajaj Auto Ltd. @ ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dditions on various grounds. It is also on record that the statements of the Authorized Representative of M/s. Bajaj Auto Ltd. as also of M/s. Anurang Engg. Co. Ltd., are to the effect that the prices of ingots were negotiated prices. However the adjudicating authority has observed that though the process were agreed but they were not genuine and were adopted for undervaluation of the final produc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e. The entire case is based on assumptions & presumptions as such we are of the view that the confirmation of duty against M/s. Anurang Engg. Co. Ltd. is not sustainable. 1.4 Apart from the merit of the case we also note that the demand is hopelessly barred by limitation. Notice for the period June 98 to September, 99 was issued on 5-3-2001. The ingots were being cleared by M/s. Bajaj Auto....