Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (7) TMI 493

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant. Shri Deepak Garg, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides and perused the record. The dispute is about the assessable value of pepsi manufactured by the appellant during the period 1994-95. The appellant was paying duty on a value of Rs. 44/- per crate of pepsi. Under the impugned order, the assessable value has been refixed at Rs. 54/- b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....'s price was Rs. 44/- the assessee would be not able to sell in the market at a higher price than that. [9] 2.Learned SDR has pointed out that the Commissioner has gone in detail into the method of billing and collection made by the appellant, and the findings are well supported. 3. Prima facie, there is merit in the appellant's contention. When the value of neighbour's unit was al....