Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2005 (3) TMI 623

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard ld. JDR. 2. None appeared on behalf of the respondents. The ld. JDR submitted that the Commissioner (Appeals) has not considered various decisions relied on by the Revenue, such as :- (1)     Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. reported in [1988 (34) E.L.T. 30 (Bom.) = 2002 (83) ECC 497 (Bom.)]. (2) &....

PrevPreviousNextNext