2004 (12) TMI 569

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant. Shri Vimlesh Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The prayer in the stay petition is to dispense with the condition of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 34,04,320/- (Rupees thirty four lakhs four thousand three hundred and twenty only) and personal penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs (Rupees ten lakhs only). The said demand has been confirmed against the appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....final value of the exempted goods. In any case, ld. Advocate submits that the Commissioner, while confirming the demand of duty has not given any adjustment of the credit actually reversed by them. However, Shri Prakash Shah does not plead any financial hardship. 3.Countering the arguments, Shri Vimlesh Kumar, ld. SDR draws our attention to the provisions of Rule 6(3). He submits that an assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....clear the same on reversal of Modvat credit, where a common account has been maintained. In all other cases, sub-clause (b) would get attracted. If legislature intended to allow the manufacturers to clear the exempted goods after reversing the Modvat credit, in all other cases also, there was no requirement to classify the goods under two different clauses as (a) and (b). As such, we are of the vi....