Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (7) TMI 434

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....V. Parelkar, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Moheb Ali M., Member (T)]. - The appellants exported 100% cotton (fabric dyed) handloom pot holders and oven mitts under DEPB Scheme. The FOB value declared is Rs. 26,75,741/-. Examination carried out by the docks staff revealed that the goods were quilted made ups and the material used for quilts was 100% Polyester Fibre. The Exporter claim....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ain reading of Serial No. 72 shows that the products should be cotton made-ups. The appellant does not dispute the fact that the export product did contain 100% polyester fibre at least on the frill. Therefore, Sr. No. 72 does not cover the product. DEPB of 12% claimed on FOB value has been rightly denied. The appellant argues that no penalty should have been imposed, as other consignments exporte....