Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (8) TMI 426

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant. Shri Bipin Garg, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - In these appeals the Revenue has contested the correctness of the impugned order-in-appeal vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has dropped the duty demand of Rs. 20,068/- with penalty of Rs. 20,000/- against the respondents as confirmed by the adjudicating authority, by reversing the order-in-original of that authority. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....plied that information, in order to check the veracity of the same, when requested by the appellants. No excess or shortage of raw-material or the finished goods was found by the officers in the factory of the appellants on 2-12-1999, when they paid visit. The Commissioner (Appeals) under these circumstances has in my view, rightly reversed the order of the adjudicating authority and dropped the d....