2005 (6) TMI 362
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pellant. Shri R.V. Ramakrishnappa, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - The appellants are challenging the confirmation of interest under Section 11AB and penalty under Rule 25 of the CE Rules. Even after the appellants have pre-deposited the duty amounts before the issue of Show Cause Notice along with the interest at 13%, the department initiated proceedings....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....508 (Kar.). He also refers to the Larger Bench judgment rendered in the case of CCE v. Machino Montell (I) Ltd. - 2004 (168) E.L.T. 466 (Tri.-LB). He further refers to a large number of this Bench's orders disposing of such matters by granting relief. He prays for allowing the appeal. 3. The learned JDR reiterated the departmental view. 4. On a careful consideration, we notice from....
TaxTMI