2005 (6) TMI 351

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ocate, for the Appellant. Shri R.N. Viswanath, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. -  These three appeals are filed against the Order (Original) No. 03/2003, dated 15-3-2003, passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Visakhapatnam. 2. The brief facts of the case is as follows :- M/s. Panax Cashew, Bhubaneswar exported the consignment of 700 cart....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ith Section 7(1)(a) of FEMA, 1999 and also under Section 118(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, for having been mis-declared in description and value of the goods i.e. by way of exporting raw cashew as against cashew nut kernel declared. (2)   The packing materials viz. tins and cartons containing the above goods should not be confiscated under Section 118 of the Customs Act, 1962; and (....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ared for the appellants, M/s. Chakiat Agencies and Shri Suresh Kumar, learned Advocate appeared for the appellants, M/s. Panax Cashews & Anr. and Shri R. N. Viswanath, learned SDR appeared on behalf of the Revenue. 4. We have heard the parties. We find that when the goods were exported from India vide Shipping Bill dated 20-10-2000, from the records it appears that the examination of the C....