Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (6) TMI 341

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as the Revenue) for withdrawing the immunity granted to M/s. Frost International Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) in terms of Final Order No. 71/2004-Cus., dated 23-11-2004 [2005 (182) E.L.T. 272 (Sett. Comm.)]. 2. The facts of the case are covered in full details in the Final Order dated 23-11-2004 (supra). The facts relevant for this order are that the respondent was misusing the Advance Licence Scheme by exporting inferior substitute material misdeclaring it as Garlic Powder. Intelligence also suggested that the goods imported duty free under the Advance Licence obtained by the respondent viz. Garlic (bulbs) had been diverted and sold in the domestic market for profit in violation of conditions of the said Advanc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....inst the respondent. The ld. Dy. Director further went on to argue that the respondent has suppressed these material facts before the Commission and mislead the Commission by stating that it had been cheated by the supporting manufacturers. Consequently, the immunity granted to the respondent from payment of interest in excess of 10% p.a. and from fine, penalty and prosecution may be withdrawn. In reality no manufacture took place. After import, the goods were straightaway diverted into the local markets at Chennai & Mumbai. There was no cheating by the supporting manufacturers. Since the goods involved were worth crores of rupees it could not be believed those were handed over to supporting manufacturers without any verification about the ....