Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2005 (3) TMI 592

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellant. Shri B.L. Goyal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. -  Heard both sides and perused the record. 2. Out of the duty demand of Rs. 1.4 lakhs, the appellants had already deposited Rs. 75,000/-. In our view, this deposit is sufficient for the purpose of hearing of the appeal. Therefore, the requirement for pre-deposit of the remaining am....

PrevPreviousNextNext