Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (1) TMI 494

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. -  This appeal arises from OIA No. 499/2001, dated 3-7-2001. The appellants are manufacturers of Filter Inserts. They also manufacture Banian Cloth and Sleeve (Tubular knitted filter cloth) and captively consumed the same for further manufacture of Filter Inserts. They are not marketing the item which is captively consumed nor it is sold. As ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....od of time, they issued show cause notice dated 19-11-1998 to classify the captively consumed item under Chapter Heading 59.11 of the CET. The show cause notice clearly admitted that this banian cloth and sleeve was being used in the manufacture of Filter Inserts and captively consumed. This show cause notice was issued only after obtaining all the details from the appellant. The appellant resiste....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../97, dated 29-5-1997. The Commissioner also has referred to the Tribunal's ruling rendered in the case of Simplex Mills by Final Order No. 150 to 161/92-D1, dated 28-2-1992 reported in [2004 (176) E.L.T. 587 = 1993 (49) ECR 147 (Tribunal)], which has been confirmed by the Apex Court. 2. We have heard both sides in the matter. 3. The learned Counsel had argued on the aspect pertaining t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... learned Counsel's main argument is with regard to the grant of benefit of Notification No. 67/1995-C.E., dated 16-3-1995. We have heard learned DR also in the matter. 6. On our careful consideration and perusal of this Notification, we find that this Notification clearly applies to the captively consumed goods and does not fall in any of the exclusion clauses referred to in the Notification....