2004 (2) TMI 644
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....esentative, for the Appellant. Ms. Charul Baranwal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - Through the present ROM, the appellants have sought the recall of the Final order dated 22-2-2002 [2002 (142) E.L.T. 106 (Tri. - Del.)] of the Tribunal by which their appeal against the order in original of the Commissioner of Central Excise dated 27-7-2001 was dismis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e find that all these relevant facts, circumstances and evidence had been considered and discussed in paras 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 of the impugned final order. The ratio of the law laid down in both the above referred cases had also been discussed in para 5 of the order. 5. It is well settled that scope of ROM is quite limited under the law. The mistake of fact or law apparent on the record only c....
TaxTMI