2005 (4) TMI 323

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. Shri Randhir Singh, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. -  This is an application by M/s. La Grande Projects Ltd. for restoration of their appeal which was dismissed for default in terms of Rule 20 of CEGAT (Procedure) Rules vide Final Order No. A/141/98-NB, dated 4-3-1998. 2. Shri K.K. Anand, learned Advocate for the applicants, submitted that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....restoration of the appeal. The learned Advocate also relied upon the decision of the Gujarat High Court in the case of Viral Laminates Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India - 1998 (100) E.L.T. 335 (Guj.) wherein the Gujarat High Court has held that the Tribunal is not empowered to dismiss the appeal for default of appearance. 3. Opposing the prayer, Shri Randhir Singh, JDR, submitted that though no ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tioned that in Supreme Industries Ltd. case (supra), the application filed after four-and-half years of dismissal, was rejected. 4. We have considered the submissions of both the sides. The submissions made by the learned Advocate are well founded. There is a Column No. 6 in C.A.-3 Applications which requires appellant to mention the address to which notices may be sent. We find that the a....