2005 (3) TMI 549

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri Meena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. -  The appellant is a Training Institution engaged in manufacture of certain tools. Partly they are sold and partly they used captively. The tools captively used were under exemption till 1-3-1994 under Notification No. 58/86. The exemption was rescinded with effect from 1-3-1994 and was not restored for a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ounsel submitted that in any event there was no justification for the imposition or heavy penalty since the appellant was a Training Institution. 3. Ld. DR has submitted that contention of the appellant has no merit. His view is that since the exemption was not available for more than a year, it is clear that the revocation of the exemption was not unintentional. With regard to limitation,....