Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (2) TMI 600

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent. [Order]. -  In this appeal, the Revenue has contested the impugned order-in-appeal vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has dropped the penalty on the respondents on the ground that they had deposited the entire duty amount before the issuance of the show cause notice by following the law laid down in the case of Dynamatic Technologies Ltd. v. CCE, Chennai - 2003 (54) RLT 675 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rcumstances of the case, this deposit cannot be said to be voluntary by them. It was made by them when they were confronted with tampering of record/sale invoices. Therefore, their conduct did not warrant the setting aside of penalty on them. The ratio of law laid down in the above referred cases relied upon by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) could not be invoked as the facts in those cases wer....