2005 (1) TMI 487

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri L. Narasimha Murthy, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) (Oral)]. - This ROM application has been filed against the Final Order Nos. 1561 to 1566/2004, dated 28-9-2004  [2005 (180) E.L.T. 350 (T)]. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant submitted that there is a mistake in paras 6 and 7 of the said final order, wh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eading 4823.90 as contended by the Revenue. The above decision of the CEGAT was challenged by the Revenue in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court rejected the stay of the CEGAT's order classifying the goods as products of printing industry. Moreover she contended that the appellants are not the manufacturers of the impugned products and if at all there is any manufacture the job workers only sh....