Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (11) TMI 442

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vocate argued the case on behalf of the applicants. S/Shri M.L. Grover, Advocate, Sunil Verma, and A.K. Wadhera also remained present. 2. The ld. Advocate while submitting the facts of the case, stated that the applicant was granted Advance Licence No. 0610003753, dated 25-6-2002 by the Jt. DGFT, Kanpur. The applicant under the said licence, had imported floacking fabrics under 2 Bills of Entry at Port of Nhava Sheva. The applicant could not fulfil the export obligation as envisaged in that licence. He further submitted that the applicant is engaged in international trade besides domestic trading. The main applicant has received a notice from the DGFT dated 25-8-2004 after applicant paid the entire duty to Revenue which was foregone....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iled SLP in the Supreme Court against the order of Gujarat High Court in the case of M/s. Mahendra Petrochemicals Ltd. He requested for a week's time to know the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the said SLP. 7. The ld. Advocate of the applicant submitted that the SLP was filed by the Revenue after a gap of around 9 months, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has to first condone the late filing of SLP. He objected to the grant of a week's time requested by the Revenue. The judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court is the law prevalent today. He requested that the case may be admitted. 8. The Revenue further submitted that the notice issued by DGFT reproduced above, does not demand any duty and therefore, it is not a case cov....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....id and that is why evidence of payment was demanded. This letter effectively gives birth to a proceeding before the Jt. DGFT for cancellation of the Advance Licence which would be possible only after the applicant satisfies the Jt. DGFT that the appropriate amount of customs duty and interest thereon has been paid by the applicant. To determine the question of cancellation of the Advance licence, payment of appropriate amount of customs duty and interest thereon would be the subject of proceeding before the Jt. DGFT. Thus, the Jt. DGFT will also have to go into the levy, assessment, collection of customs duty and interest thereon before cancelling the Advance licence whose conditions were breached by the applicant. In view of our comprehens....