2005 (3) TMI 501
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Respondent. [Order (Oral)]. - This appeal is against Order-in-Original No. 2346/2004 dated 22-6-2004 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai. In the above order, the Commissioner has imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the appellant. The appellant states that revenue initiated proceedings against the appellants who are Customs House Agents on the basis of the statement of o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... on the behalf of the appellant and Shri U. Rajaram, SDR Adv. for the respondents. 3. Ld. Advocate produced the records of appellant-company indicating the list of identity cards issued to various employees to show that the so called P.K. Ansar Basha was not at all employed by them. Even the very physical existence of a person known as P.K. Ansar Basha is in doubt. Ld. SDR pointed out that....
TaxTMI