2005 (2) TMI 566
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - In this appeal, the Revenue has contested the correctness of the impugned order-in-appeal vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the confiscation of the seized goods (silk yarn) and imposition of penalty on the respondent. 2. None has come on behalf of the respondent. No request for adjournment has been received from....
TaxTMI