Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (12) TMI 478

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., DR, for the Respondent. [Order (Oral)]. - This application filed by the assessee seeks stay of operation of the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The original authority had, in an order dated 7-11-2003, sanctioned refund of an amount of Rs. 3,78,690/- to the assessee but appropriated the same towards a pre-existing demand of duty of Rs. 2,47,94,011/-. This order of the Dy. Comm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot disputed that the assessee's appeal against the demand of duty of Rs. 2,47,94,011/- is due to be considered on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals) pursuant to the remand order passed by this Tribunal in Appeal No. E/655/2004. Hence, apparently, it is premature on the part of the Revenue to assert that the above amount of duty is "due" to them from the assessee and, in such circumstances, the B....