Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (12) TMI 425

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant. Shri R.V. Ramakrishnappa, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - The appellants are challenging the correctness of the OIA No. 439/2002-C.E., dated 16-7-2002 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected the appellants' prayer to give deduction to the value of durable and returnable bags in terms of Section 4(4)(d)(i). The appellants have relied on a la....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ely indicated. He submits that the stock transfer of the goods in question was made in durable and returnable bags and, therefore, the price figuring in the pricelist for the Alumina in the returnable bags was adopted. The invoices raised by the appellants under Rule 52A of C.E. Rules also clearly indicated that the goods were returnable. Therefore, he submits that the findings recorded by the Com....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tteries Ltd. v. CCE, Bangalore - 2003 (153) E.L.T. 7 (S.C.); and (ii)    Jay Yushin Ltd. v. CCE, New Delhi - 2000 (119) E.L.T. 718 (Tribunal - LB) The learned Counsel also relied on the Larger Bench decision rendered in the case of Srichakra Tyres Ltd. v. CCE, Madras - 1999 (108) E.L.T. 361 (Tribunal) which has been confirmed by the Apex Court as reported in 2002 (142) E.L.T. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....preme Court. Furthermore, the findings recorded by the original authority that ultimately the packing material gets decayed after repeated use is no ground to direct the appellants to add its value in the cost of the goods. This is a new principle introduced by the lower authorities. Any packing material, after further uses, would become a scrap and merely because it becomes waste or scrap after r....