2004 (10) TMI 475

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri J.R. Madhiam, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Jain, Member (T)]. -  Heard the Advocate for the Appellant. The dispute is regarding the classification of Infraphil-HL 4307 manufactured by the Appellant which the Appellant have classified from 1986 to 1996 in Tariff sub-heading 9018. The Department has changed the classification of the ab....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he penalty imposed in the Commissioner's (Appeals) present order which is in dispute. 2. Shri J.R. Madhiam, ld. JDR reiterates the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) in OA, dated 31-10-2003. 3. We find that this product was classified under Tariff sub-heading 9018 by the Department and this continued till the Department issued a show-cause-notice-cum demand after more than ten ....