Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (7) TMI 631

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri A. Chopra, DR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  In the order impugned in this appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the denial by the Asstt. Commissioner of the credit of the appellant on 20-7-94 of the duty shown to have been paid on the original copy of the invoice issued on 18-5-94. 2. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) makes sorry reading. It says that si....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....came on the statute book on 20-5-94, after the invoice was issued. 3. The credit was taken by the appellant on 20-7-94 after sub-rule (2A) came into effect. That rule governed taking of credit and not issued on invoices. The appellant was therefore entitled to claim the benefit of this rule. In its letter of 20-7-94, the appellant had informed the Asst. Collector of the loss of the duplica....