Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (7) TMI 533

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri S.S. Bhagat, SDR, for the Respondent [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - Appellant was an 100% EOU set up. They were permitted by the Ministry of Industry to close the EOU operations on condition of Re-export of the entire capital goods imported to set up the 100% EOU. They were also requested to pay all custom/excise duties on the stocks of raw material, components, consumables, sp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 4,49,322/- along with interest on 3 packages valued at Rs. 3,37,203/- said to be lost/pilfered from the warehouse at Kalamboli while being on way to export to Belgium. (ii)     Demand notice dated 24-10-1993 under Section 72(b) of Customs Act, 1962 of Rs. 19,62,434/- being duty on Raw material lying unutilised in the Private Branded Warehoused as also interest of Rs. 12....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and duty of Rs. 4,49,322/- on goods at Kalamboli warehouse. (b) In appeal filed by the EOU, the Commissioner (Appeals) found - "The appellant re-exported machinery to Belgium vide shipping bill number SK dated 25-4-1991. Since goods were re-exported Customs duty was not demanded by lower authority. However, machineries were lying in the appellants bonded warehouse beyond the warehousing....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the case of CC v. Jayathi Krishna & Co. 2000 (119) E.L.T. 4 (S.C.). The interest is held to be an accessory to the principal and if principal is not payable, so is the interest on it. Therefore, the interest on goods exported out of India is not payable since duty thereon is not demanded. (b)     As regards the raw material and finished goods, the rate of duty has to be lev....