Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (4) TMI 490

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ikh, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The appellants is trader and deals with grey and processed fabrics. His premise was put to search on 12-6-1998 and 46 pcs. of processed fabrics were seized on the reasonable belief that the same were cleared form the processing houses without payment of duty. 2. On the above fact show cause notice dated 11-12-1998 was issued to the appellants ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ut upheld the confiscation of the goods with an option to the appellants to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine of Rs. 98, 000/-. The said part of the impugned order is challenged before me. 3. I have heard Shri J.C. Patel, learned advocate and Shri M.H. Sheikh, learned D.R. 4. The appellants main contention is that in the absence of any verification from the processing h....