2003 (12) TMI 553
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....: Shri R.S. Dinkar, Advocate, for the Appellant . Shri P.M. Rao, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. - These are two applications for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty as under : (i) M/s. Maniar and Company Duty Rs. 2,76,520/- Penalty Rs. 2,76,520/- (ii) Shafi Abdul Rahim Maniar P....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion 35F of the Central Excise Act. He emphasised that the demand of duty is hit by time limit as the show cause notice has been issued on 4-2-2000 whereas the demand pertains to the period from October, 1995 to September, 1998; that the Applicants had filed the classification declaration classifying the product (fabrication of loader on tractor) under Heading 87.05; that Department had issued a n....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d from the Department and as such larger period of limitation is invocable. 4. We have considered the submissions of both the sides. The Commissioner (Appeals) has neither heard the Applicants while rejecting their Misc. Application for modification of the Stay Order passed by him nor before dismissing their appeals. We, therefore, after staying the recovery of entire duty and penalty, set....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI