Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (10) TMI 595

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri S. Bhatnagar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The dispute in the instant case relates to the Modvat credit of Rs. 3,55,759/- and also penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/-. 2. The appellants paid additional duty of customs (countervailing duty) of Rs. 3,55,759/- on the entire shipment of Butyl Rubber weighing 21,150 M.T. imported vide Bill of Entry No. 3553, dated 18-12-1997. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cate copy is 5,508 M.T. instead of 21,150 M.T, of Butyl Rubber imported and that in the FIR, the name of the exporting country is Dubai whereas the same is Russia, as is evident from attested Customs copy produced by the appellants. 3. Heard both sides. 4. It is noticed that subsequent to the loss of triplicate copy of bill of entry, the appellants obtained attested copy of the ori....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....however, in the name of the appellants [M/s. Tirupati Tubes (P) Ltd. which was the former name of M/s. Unique Butyl Tube Industries (P) Ltd.] There is no dispute that the goods have been received in the factory and no dispute as to the description of goods as mentioned in the bill of entry vis-a-vis, the goods against which the credit has been taken. The Central Excise Rules provide contingency in....