2003 (7) TMI 628
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hri O.P. Arora, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. - Appellants filed this appeal against the adjudication order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise whereby the Commissioner held that the demand is within the period and not barred by the limitation. 2. Brief facts of the case are that appellants are engaged in the manufacture of excisable goo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ich was served on the appellant on 12-1-95. The contention of the appellant is that the show cause notice was served upon them beyond the normal period of limitation. Therefore, whole demand is time-bar. 5. The contention of the Revenue is that the credit was taken in respect of the capital goods in question, on or after 1-8-94 and the show cause notice was served upon by the appellants on....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI