Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (3) TMI 616

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent. [Order]. - When the case was called none appeared on behalf of the appellant inspite of notice. Therefore, the appeal is being taken up in absence of the appellant for hearing. 2. Heard learned SDR for the Revenue. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods. Appellants were receiving the inputs from Re-ro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e is that the photocopy of invoices produced by the appellant shows that manufacturer has paid duty under Notification No. 50/97 and as per this Notification; the rate of duty was 300/MT. Therefore, credit can be taken by appellant of the duty paid by the manufacturer. 6. I find, from the copies of invoice produced by the appellant, that the manufacturer of the inputs, has paid duty under ....