2004 (8) TMI 456

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espondent. [Order (Oral)]. - This matter does not figure in today's hearing list before this Bench. It has been mentioned by the appellants' Counsel, who submits that a demand notice dated 19-7-2004 has been issued to them by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-V Division. Counsel prays for extension of stay of recovery of the amount of penalty. I have heard the DR also. 2.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ubt as to whether this Bench can extend the operation of the stay order passed by the Division Bench. 3. It appears to me from the available records and the submissions that the limited issue involved in the appeal is whether any penalty was liable to be imposed on the appellants under Rule 96ZO of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 in the facts and circumstances of the case and, if so, to wha....