2004 (8) TMI 436

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Appellant. Shri Sanjay Singhal, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - Appellants are an assessee engaged in the manufacture of Plastic Moulded articles supplied to various OE manufacturers and their Director. They are aggrieved by the demands of duties made on the assessee along with penalties and interest & penalty under rule 209A on the Director, cons....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y already were issued a demand for their Thane factory, directing them to add the entire amount of such Development Charges and Tribunal had remitted the matter back for quantification by amortization recovery formula and they were following the same by adding the amortization amounts to determine the value. However, the Commissioner did not find that to be factually correct, he confirmed the dema....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l have to be reworked out by amortization of this 60% over the entire supplies effected. For this purpose the demand is to be reworked. This addition now determined, has to be over the 15% amortization if already effected by the assessee to recover their cost from the price of 50,000 pieces as per the agreement. For the Rear Bumper 50% cost has to be amortized over the bumpers cleared and duty wor....