2004 (5) TMI 425

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Ms. Charul Baranwal, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. -  In this appeal, the challenge has been made by the appellants to the impugned order in original dated 5-8-2003 vide which the adjudicating authority has confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 7,11,469/- with equal amount of penalty. 2. The duty has been confirmed against the appellants on accoun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....159/- but their claim was rejected by the Commissioner vide order dated 14-12-2000. Their appeal against the said order was dismissed by the Tribunal under Section 35F for having failed to comply with its stay order. 5. After the dismissal of the abatement claim of the appellants, the duty of the amount in question detailed above has been affirmed against the appellants as they did not pay....