Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (8) TMI 460

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....GMENT 1. This order shall dispose of Company Petition Nos. 10 and 11 of 2007. Both these petitions have been filed by Manjit Singh Dhillon and Harmandeep Singh, the President and Secretary, respectively, of the Prehari Mutual Welfare Society (Registered), under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for stay of proceedings in the criminal complaints under se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....heques issued by Prehari Mutual Welfare Society (Registered), therefore, proceedings in those criminal complaints be stayed during the pendency of the aforesaid winding up petitions. 4. Counsel for the Official Liquidator submits that perusal of the criminal complaints annexed with the petitions shows that these complaints were filed in the month of July, 2004, for the dishonour of the cheques da....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... aforesaid factual position. However, he submits that the petitioners accepted the deposit from the respondents for act on behalf of Prehari group of companies under liquidation, therefore, the proceedings should be stayed. 6. After hearing counsel for the parties, I do not find any merit in these petitions. Section 446 of the Act only bars proceedings against the company where a winding up order....