Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws →

☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2004 (7) TMI 420

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-7-2004<br>E/2389/98-Mum - A/1226/2004-WZB/C-I<br>Central Excise<br>Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram, Shri Moheb Ali M., JJ. REPRESENTED BY : None, for the Appellant. Shri Ajay Saxena, SDR, for the Respondent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appellants in spite of notice; hence we heard the learned SDR and perused the records. 3.&emsp;The learned SDR's reliance on the language of Rules 51A and 52A to support the duty demand is not tenabl....

PrevPreviousNextNext