Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (2) TMI 536

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Pardesi, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - Appellants are a licenced Custom House Agent. They filed a BE for part of Sulphur imported of MMTC and allotted to M/s. CIBA Epoxy Chemicals on Sea Basis. After the clearance of the goods on provisional duty assessment the department raised an issue that Importer Code No. was not mentioned in the BE. Summon dt. 11-9-1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... considering the matter, it is found : (a)        That the prescribed registers, required under Regulation 14(a), were not maintained by CHA firm, has been established. The other charge of aiding and abetting the importer in illegal import of crude Sulphur is not established since the BEs without Code No. were noted and assessed provisionally and the Code No. ....