Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (6) TMI 397

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellant. Shri Vikas Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. -  Applicants filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 46,53,866/- and penalty of equal amount on the Firm. 2. The demand was confirmed on the ground that applicants cleared the final product without payment of duty. 3. The contention of the applicant....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... filed by the partners passed the impugned order. 4. The Revenue relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of Collector of Central Excise & Customs v. Leelamma George, reported 2004 (163) E.L.T. 17 (Ker.) where the High Court held that in case of short-levy of duty proceedings can continue against the manufacturer and the demand has to be met by the legal repres....