2004 (6) TMI 367
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J) (Oral)]. - There is a demand of duty of Rs. 15,87,566/- on the appellants. This is a demand on about 1254 MTs of newsprint cleared by them from their factory to their depot, prior to removal of the goods to the newspaper company which placed purchase orders on the appellants. After hearing both sides, we note that the basis of this demand is the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....4, the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner had permitted the appellants to remove exempted newsprint from their factory to depot. Ld. SDR has argued that such permission lapsed with the amendment dated 31-8-1995 of Notification No. 60/88-C.E. She has, in this context referred to a subsequent letter dated 31-10-1995 issued by the Assistant Commissioner to the party, wherein it was intimated that ....