2004 (6) TMI 365
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..../ Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 2-6-2004<br>E/1352/2004-Mum - S/93/2004-WZB/C-IV<br>Central Excise<br>Shri Krishna Kumar, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri R. Venkataraman, G.M., for the Appellant. Shri ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s is an accepted fact. As such, the applicant-appellant cannot be held liable for duty in view of the provisions as contained in Clause 2(ii)(b) of Notification No. 42/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dtd. 26-6-2001....
TaxTMI