2008 (6) TMI 352

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Appellant. ORDER Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. - Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench granting interim protection to Respondent No. 1. 2. Briefly stated factual scenario is as follows: A show-cause notice was issued by the appellant on 9-5-2008 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sitors. The High Court passed the impugned order on 5-6-2008 staying the operation and the enforcement of the order dated 4-6-2008 impugned before it till further orders of the High Court. The High Court has also indicated that since objection was taken to certain activities of respondent No. 1, they were directed to complete all the requisite formalities and follow the directions of the present a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n by the appellant. With reference to the show-cause notice dated 9-5-2008 and order dated 4-6-2008 it is submitted that several illegalities have been committed and there is total lack of transparency in the functioning of respondent No. 1. Several serious infirmities have been elaborately dealt with in the show-cause notice and order dated 4-6-2008. 4. Learned senior counsel appearing for Res....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n his submission that the principles of natural justice have been followed in the present ease. But an opportunity of hearing would be appropriate, because of nature of proceedings. It shall not be construed as if we have stated so to be applicable in all cases. Because of the peculiar nature of the case, we are directing to be so done. We, therefore, direct that Respondent No. 1 shall appear with....